From l & aacu; The state against the occupiers and the beginning of Maria José Amaral, the lawyer for the occupation, excluding alleged incompetence (as determined under trial - jurisdiction - Do ; has jurisdiction over the case) the state court because there was a tax foreclosure action against the Union that company and the property was pledged as collateral OF PERFORMANCE ; the debt, so that the reintegration process was referred to the Federal Court (22nd stick, the foreclosures, sincethat ownership of the property field would depend on the resolution of litigation between the company UnionThe). There was, in fact, going to a federal court process, but stick to the 21st (civil court). There was an interlocutory decision of the federal judge who granted the injunction (which is not sentencing decision, but what happens during the process), also after a positive decision of Federal prosecutors, for reinstatement, as the "robbery" took place less than a year. It was generated in an attempt to dump occupies & ccedil; will in June this year. Maria Jose aggravated the interim, but was dismissed in Federal Court (TRF). Since August 3, the action is completion to the judge's decision, ie there is a risk it any day to give the final ruling ordering the reinstatement of the land and there a dump.

The lawyer argues that the injunction dump contradicts the law signed by President Lula in 2007 according to which areas seized by the Union used for purposes of agrarian reform or urban. As a result, she is preparing an appeal against the injunction for reinstatement to