The area south of Recife wakes under huge black smoke. The heat of the flames and huge smoke feels it sees long distance. Tires, couches, wood, gasoline and fire are the ingredients that come together to warm cloudy early in the morning of September 2. The two senses of Avenida Recife are banned by debris burning. Behind the blocking of the residents occupation Josué de Castro, extendsscent material to fire so he would not go out. At some point, spontaneously put a table in the middle of one track and started playing dominoes beside the rubble still smoldering. Soon they had the idea of beating a naked and burned play on the Avenue, which not only strengthen the peaceful character of the protest, reveals a critical approach to ause NCIA of public recreational areas in the periphery.
To give his version of events appeared to Folha de Pernambuco, Jornal do Commercio, TV and Newspapers (SBT) successively. Even a helicopter Network Globo flew quickly over the place filming the traffic jam that was caused. After about two hours the residents contain the outbreak in a large circle, joining hands and reinforcing that will not give up their right to housing without a fight.
Brief History
The terrain of abandoned tire company Michelin, approximately 7200M ² in the district of Ibura, the area south of Recife, along the Avenida Recife, was occupied by about 90 families on 20 September 2008.
From l & aacu; The state against the occupiers and the beginning of Maria José Amaral, the lawyer for the occupation, excluding alleged incompetence (as determined under trial - jurisdiction - Do ; has jurisdiction over the case) the state court because there was a tax foreclosure action against the Union that company and the property was pledged as collateral OF PERFORMANCE ; the debt, so that the reintegration process was referred to the Federal Court (22nd stick, the foreclosures, sincethat ownership of the property field would depend on the resolution of litigation between the company UnionThe). There was, in fact, going to a federal court process, but stick to the 21st (civil court). There was an interlocutory decision of the federal judge who granted the injunction (which is not sentencing decision, but what happens during the process), also after a positive decision of Federal prosecutors, for reinstatement, as the "robbery" took place less than a year. It was generated in an attempt to dump occupies & ccedil; will in June this year. Maria Jose aggravated the interim, but was dismissed in Federal Court (TRF). Since August 3, the action is completion to the judge's decision, ie there is a risk it any day to give the final ruling ordering the reinstatement of the land and there a dump.
The lawyer argues that the injunction dump contradicts the law signed by President Lula in 2007 according to which areas seized by the Union used for purposes of agrarian reform or urban. As a result, she is preparing an appeal against the injunction for reinstatement to
0 comments:
Post a Comment